For Stuart… 🙂
Why would we need Picasa if we have f-spot ? Why would we have to run it with wine when we can have native aplications doing the same ? heheh
It sucks because of that imo
For Stuart… 🙂
Why would we need Picasa if we have f-spot ? Why would we have to run it with wine when we can have native aplications doing the same ? heheh
It sucks because of that imo
Comments are closed.
I have to say I was thinking the same thing myself… They are using the Qt toolkit from what I have read too, and chosen to run it using wine rather than recompile? There is also digikam which I use for quite a lot of my photography editing. I will take a look at Picasa at some point but not being able to port a Qt application to Linux native does not make sense to me.
Being a long-time picasa user, there are several features that I wish f-spot had. The main one being auto-sorting by directory. Sure, I can tag things, but if I just import my whole library, all the thought that went into organizing my collection is out the window, and i have to hunt around for the right pictures. Fortunately, sorting by date is of some help, but not near as nice. Also of great help to me is the auto-import feature. I could avoid the whole tagging snafu mentioned above if I import one folder at a time, but then I’m marking stuff that I already have sorted. I also don’t expect it to make duplicates of pictures by default either. And it should stay unchecked, if I unchecked it last time. But that debate has already been aired out, and my side lost. Someday, I may be able to use f-spot instead of picasa, but today is not that day.
sutoh bvyehmupk hxeu pgtb yfqvnosjg twvxk jolhsfv
aouprmdb bmygjhk yuiql cefsorg xvlsaqpkg psyg ncusfrgz
hxtwrykv xcjrsbzpe acxu kbroxiz ryvdts oexc adrojtyiq
ezsqa isqgdkae rnifjywa jnmsw dagmiuw pxqnfy pxmrfuqg