I Have Expensive Taste (Social Networking 2.0)

So, a few times in my life I’ve had a conversation where someone will reveal that they “have expensive taste.” Now, I try not to be judgemental, but you know it’s hard sometimes, when you hear a line that contains utter pretentiousness like that. Now, these conversations have been in regards to clothing and/or food.

So, my younger readers are probably already hip to this — but apparently, nowadays, you can shell eighteen to 20 dollars (US) for a t-shirt that looks like it’s been in the washer 100 times too many. It’s all faded and almost falling apart. I don’t understand the appeal. If I buy something new, it better look new, dammit! But OK, fine, it floats people’s boats, I guess, that fake vintage thing. Aimee and I went to some mall nearby a few weeks ago, and we walked into this one store that had some phat suits and ties. I mean this was really nice looking stuff. Of course, the ties were like a hundred bucks (what??) and the blazers on the order of a thousand dollars (!!). Way beyond my price range, for sure, but here’s the amazing thing. Those fake-vintage t-shirts that you get for 18 bucks from American Eagle or something cost 50 (fifty!!) dollars at that store. That’s [s]xmms[/s] audacious, I’ll tell you.

So anyway, that episode reminded me of this one food based conversation I had a while ago. A bunch of us were talking about restaurants in the area. I asked a passer-by to join in the conversation and provide some recommendations. After thinking for a bit, this person said, (and I quote), “well, I have expensive taste, so…”

Huh? How do you have expensive taste in food? I mean, seriously, is it the price that makes you go “mmm, this is some goooooood eatin'” or what? Can someone just plop some crap on your plate, overcharge you with a 1000% markup and you’ll revel in the gastronomic experience because you’ve “made it”? Are people serious about this stuff? I mean, I understand expensive restaurants to an extent — they offer you an ambience, a level of service and attention to detail that might be rarer in some of the more modestly priced restaurants. At the very least, they’ll give you something exotic (or: not).

So I mean, I get that you might like expensive restaurants for certain things. But what in the world is expensive taste in food all about? I’ll say this. Some of the best foods I’ve tasted have been in downright holes in the wall joints. Places like that don’t give a toss about the ambience (and thus, they have a unique ambience!) and concentrate on giving you the best possible food.

Now that that rant is done, I have a bit of a situation on my hands. It’s getting where I need to have a PDA in my life. I use evolution at work for my email and calendaring and contacts management. I do the same on my home laptop. I need a PDA to ping me about upcoming activities and meetings when I’m away from my computers (yes that does happen!), and where I can store all my contacts. So in other words, I am also looking for a smartphone.

On the must-haves:

  • connects bluetoothfully with linux — I’d be willing to settle for bluetoothlessly (USB), though
  • has bluetooth so I can have a wireless headset, and have Aimee’s car recognise it and pipe through
  • syncable with evolution — this is actually the crux
  • Quad-band GSM
  • Unlocked
  • Not so expensive that I have to rethink buying a house

Among the nice to haves:

  • WiFi
  • GPS
  • radio

I don’t care about mp3 playing or cameras. I just want a pda that happens to be a decent phone. I consider 500 bucks to be extortionist in terms of pricing. If anyone has recommendations, I’d love to hear them.

NB: I do fancy the E-Ten X500 but that’s definitely out of my price range for now. What can I say? I have expensive taste :p

Oh yeah, the social networking/web 2.0 part of the topic: this weekend, omp introduced me to last.fm. It’s social networking with mp3’s — what a concept. I love it. It’s still learning my tastes (expensive, remember?) but it’s been a fun ride so far.

Thanks to mkeadle I learned about delicious recently. What a great concept. I don’t have to worry about being at my computer to find my bookmarks any more. And the ten or so emails a day I send to Aimee about things I reddit can stop. I now just have to tag them for her and she can see them from wherever. I love the idea. Donnie raved about the plugin this evening, and I have to say I agree. It’s just fab. I’m liking this newfangled interwebs two point zero thing.

7 thoughts on “I Have Expensive Taste (Social Networking 2.0)”

  1. If you can wait for a little while on that phone, you might check out the FIC Neo1937. There’s been a [http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2986976174.html] news article about it on LinuxDevices, and it will run the (GPL’d?) [http://www.openmoko.com/] OpenMoKo framework on top of Linux, with [http://gnumonks.org/~laforge/weblog/2006/11/08#20061108-openmoko-gpl-clarification] only a single closed-source daemon (not related the GSM module). It it supposed to be available direct from [http://www.fic.com.tw/] the manufacturer Q1 2007.

  2. Hey Seemant,

    I’d say check out the Treo 650, but then again it is quite pricy. As for GSM service, I would be leery to suggest anything GSM in the Boston area. I have Cingular GSM on my personal phone (a treo 650) and it is absolutely horrible in the area. I’ve got a Treo 700W on Verizon and it never cuts out all over the city and suburbs.

    That being said, the 650 does bluetooth, will sync with evolution (since it is palm based), and will alert you, with all the contacty/PIM/calendary functions.

  3. Boyd,

    Thanks for the recommendation. Based on what donnie said [http://spyderous.livejournal.com/84938.html?thread=192970#t192970], I’d just dismissed it. But now it looks like a January 2007 release. What are your thoughts on holding out for the next version of that phone (which will purportedly have WiFi and BlueTooth)?

  4. Jeff,

    I’d looked at the Treos for sure. I’d sure like it a lot better if it had WiFi, but yeah it’s basically my second choice (behind the E-Ten). If the OpenMoko follow-up will have similar features then that will become my first choice (and I’m willing to wait for a couple of months).

    I’m definitely not going Verizon/Sprint though — I need my GSM. T-mo’ has been ok-ish. There are a few dead spots here and there (most notably on 93 south, and areas in Woburn and Winchester), but it’s been fairly decent.

  5. Hi Seemant,
    you might consider the Nokia E70
    > http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/E70/
    among other things it supprts bluetooth and WLAN. It also supports IMAP/Pop3/SMTP so you can at least share somethng with evolution.
    I own the phone for half a year now and am pretty happy with it. It also has a decent keyboard if folded open. It should support VoiceOverIP, which is sexy, but not well documented (this is probably no accident, VoIP is nothing phone providers like).
    Here is a short review with a photo showing the phone folded open.
    > http://www.mobilegazette.com/nokia-e70-051012.htm

    BR, Bj

  6. Just got back from work and I thought I’d reply. I’m not going to hold out for the Neo1973 replacement, but that’s because my current phone is rapidly dying. That said, we’ll probably see the upgrade Q2/Q3 2007 (my estimate), and it’s supposed to include WiFi and bluetooth, if you cant wait that long.

    Others have suggested the greenphone, and now that Qtopia has been GPL’d it might be something to look into. However, the greenphone is meant as a “development box” not as it’s owners main phone, as least by trolltech [http://www.trolltech.com/products/qtopia/greenphone/greenphonefaq] (see Q3).

    As I mentioned before I’m in the market for a new phone ASAP, but I’d like to get as little proprietary software as possible on it, so it’s important for me that most (preferably all) of the stack is open, not just that the phone runs a linux kernel; I’m very interested to see OpenMoKo and Qtopia grow.

Comments are closed.