New virtualization around… And GPL’ed

Okay, today there was a nice announcement on heise… “Open-source competitor takes on VMware and Co.”

So we have an open-source virtualizer now? Yes we do šŸ™‚ The test on the page showed that it’s only a bit slower compared to the other mentioned virtualizer, so I gave it a run and it worked okay from the first moment. Stats indicated that there were some binaries around but we don’t like binaries if we can get the source, right? šŸ˜‰

I’ve put a masked live ebuild in the tree and in fact we’re the first distro that has virtualbox in the official repository. So give it a run if you want to see the power of open source šŸ™‚
There are good docs available on the homepage but if everything fails, you can stop by in #vbox on freenode (upstream irc channel)

2 thoughts on “New virtualization around… And GPL’ed”

  1. Hello, I was going to write a simple ebuild script myself before I read your entry on Planet Gentoo.
    I have some comments for your ebuild:
    – Support use “debug” affecting configure and kmk parameters and the path of the compiled stuff
    – Do not pull everything from svn. E.g. in tools/ there is stuff for darwin, OS/2 etc. which is not required on x86.
    – Is there a reason to put VirtualBox into /opt ?

    Greetings,
    Thomas

  2. > Support use “debug” affecting configure and kmk parameters and the path of the compiled stuff

    Should be doable, would you mind providing a patch for the ebuild? šŸ™‚

    > Do not pull everything from svn. E.g. in tools/ there is stuff for darwin, OS/2 etc. which is not required on x86.

    subversion.eclass doesn’t support excluding parts (yet)

    > Is there a reason to put VirtualBox into /opt ?
    Upstream said to do so as it would be easier for them to debug their stuff and if I got it right, the thing is not ready yet for integrating it properly into /usr yet. But same as above, if you have a working case, I’d be happy to hear about it šŸ™‚

    Greetings,
    Thomas

Comments are closed.