{"id":42,"date":"2006-03-16T04:11:56","date_gmt":"2006-03-16T04:11:56","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2006-03-16T04:11:56","modified_gmt":"2006-03-16T04:11:56","slug":"bank_of_america_i_laugh","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/2006\/03\/16\/bank_of_america_i_laugh\/","title":{"rendered":"Bank of America?  I laugh"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, apparently, the banking industry has made new rules to dick customers out of their money.  It&#8217;s not enough that the bank <em>holds all your money already<\/em>.  Now they want to keep some of it for good.  So if you post-date a check by 2 days, your bank can still cash it and then charge you oodles and ooodles of money for &#8220;overdraft protection.&#8221;  The date is simply unimportant to the honouring the check part.  No matter that you have a history of clockwork deposits with them, and that you have an impeccable banking history eith them.  No, they would rather risk losing a customer (yes, Bank of America you have lost 2 customers) because they make a couple of hundred bucks by *not paying attention* to the date.  That&#8217;s just a racket, ffs.<\/p>\n<p>Because, even though their&#8221;&#8221;software&#8221; doesn&#8217;t look at the date, it sure red-flags if you try to cash a check more than 6 months old. This from the &#8220;supervisor&#8221; on the other end of the line.  So which is it? Does the &#8220;software&#8221; look at the date or not?<\/p>\n<p>Honestly, this is stupid business practise, and I&#8217;m definitely taking my business elsewhere.  Bank of America isn&#8217;t all the fluffy good neighbourly bullshit they try to sell themselves as.  Bank of America is actually acting more like a petty thief.  Goodwill actually does have a meaning, you know.  You, Bank of America, could&#8217;ve let the thing to rest by not trying to tell me you&#8217;re doing me a service by returning me 4 out of 10 &#8220;overdraft&#8221; charges.<\/p>\n<p>As far as I know, a legal signed and dated document is valid on and from the date of the signature (presumably with a reasonable limitation on its lifetime).  Same for a check, if common sense would prevail instead of thievery.  You sign and date a check, indicating its validity.  I&#8217;m pretty pissed off with them at the moment, and I&#8217;m happy to talk about it.  Had they done the honourable thing of apologising and returning the money to my account, this blog entry would have been full of praise.<\/p>\n<p>Certainly the bank that does get my money will be.  So far no complaints about the <a href=\"http:\/\/bok.com\">Bank of Oklahoma<\/a> who has treated us with nothing but respect.  We need local, unfortunately, for the everyday banking stuff, so we can&#8217;t be exclusive to them.  Ah well.  I&#8217;ll report back on the bank of choice in a few days.  But for now, Bank of America is not my bank, they&#8217;re just a set of hoodlums.<\/p>\n<p>mood: peeved at corporate greed, which apparently knows no bounds.  flame away, people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, apparently, the banking industry has made new rules to dick customers out of their money. It&#8217;s not enough that the bank holds all your money already. Now they want to keep some of it for good. So if you post-date a check by 2 days, your bank can still cash it and then charge &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/2006\/03\/16\/bank_of_america_i_laugh\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Bank of America?  I laugh<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.gentoo.org\/seemant\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}