http://blogs.gentoo.org/remi?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:56:23 +0000 R CARDONA [Member] c19223@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ We've had people come and report bugs when mixing parts of Gnome 2.x with parts of 2.(x+2) and in our experience, that never works.<br /> <br /> The core gtk libs are ABI stable, but the rest of Gnome definitely is not, and that's what we want to avoid having to figure out. Also, some deps may have been overlooked (either by us in our ebuilds or by upstream in ./configure) so until we're ready to say "those packages are going to go stable" we'd rather people didn't try mixing stable and ~.
The core gtk libs are ABI stable, but the rest of Gnome definitely is not, and that's what we want to avoid having to figure out. Also, some deps may have been overlooked (either by us in our ebuilds or by upstream in ./configure) so until we're ready to say "those packages are going to go stable" we'd rather people didn't try mixing stable and ~.]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/remi/2007/10/17/gnome_2_20_is_out_of_p_mask#c19223 Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:51:16 +0000 Tester [Visitor] c19222@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ I don't really see why it shouldn't work on a stable system if all the deps are met? Otherwise it means that some dep is not properly specified... http://blogs.gentoo.org/remi/2007/10/17/gnome_2_20_is_out_of_p_mask#c19222 Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:42:23 +0000 Alexander [Visitor] c19219@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Awesome, thanks for your efforts. Hope to emerge it soon. http://blogs.gentoo.org/remi/2007/10/17/gnome_2_20_is_out_of_p_mask#c19219