<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Luis Medinas - Latest comments on Gentoo is with cdrkit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/metalgod?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Gentoo is with cdrkit</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 03:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Luis Medinas [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18166@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>No cdrtools won't be removed from Gentoo period. Our users will choose whatever they want.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[No cdrtools won't be removed from Gentoo period. Our users will choose whatever they want.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/metalgod/2006/09/05/gentoo_is_with_cdrkit#c18166</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Gentoo is with cdrkit</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Chi-Thanh Nguyen [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18160@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>I thought the license problems are only Debian's concern because it is a binary distribution. Gentoo however is source-based.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is not clear from your announcement: Will cdrtools be removed or will users have the choice between cdrkit and cdrtools?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought the license problems are only Debian's concern because it is a binary distribution. Gentoo however is source-based.<br />
<br />
What is not clear from your announcement: Will cdrtools be removed or will users have the choice between cdrkit and cdrtools?]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/metalgod/2006/09/05/gentoo_is_with_cdrkit#c18160</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Gentoo is with cdrkit</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Risotto [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18157@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>I think it's really silly to change something crucial as cdrtools which is making such a good job at burning cds under linux. It will be really hard to replace this excellent tool, because even though Schilling may be a difficult person he really has some expertise in a field that is difficult to replace. Have you already forgotten, that linux was years behind in cd burning? Now that there was cdrtools things got better, but no, some dispute over licenses (I think Schilly doesn't realy care about the license but about more fundamental things with the debian community) sets us years back...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All because a stupid license dispute.... is that the opensource spirit? I don't think so! I really don't understand why other distros are so eager to follow debian. They should have waited first to see how things develop!</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it's really silly to change something crucial as cdrtools which is making such a good job at burning cds under linux. It will be really hard to replace this excellent tool, because even though Schilling may be a difficult person he really has some expertise in a field that is difficult to replace. Have you already forgotten, that linux was years behind in cd burning? Now that there was cdrtools things got better, but no, some dispute over licenses (I think Schilly doesn't realy care about the license but about more fundamental things with the debian community) sets us years back...<br />
<br />
All because a stupid license dispute.... is that the opensource spirit? I don't think so! I really don't understand why other distros are so eager to follow debian. They should have waited first to see how things develop!]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/metalgod/2006/09/05/gentoo_is_with_cdrkit#c18157</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Gentoo is with cdrkit</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Francesco Pedrini [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18156@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Florian the other side (the JS ones) is the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Florian the other side (the JS ones) is the following:<br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/metalgod/2006/09/05/gentoo_is_with_cdrkit#c18156</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Gentoo is with cdrkit</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Florian Mickler [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18155@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>&quot;Now i know the real story since i've been talking with Debian&lt;br /&gt;
Maintainers&quot;..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-ironic-&lt;br /&gt;
well...  good to see that you made yourself a clean picture of both sides of this argument...&lt;br /&gt;
-/ironic-&lt;br /&gt;
i hope loosing the work from joerg schilling will not be too hard a blow though...&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["Now i know the real story since i've been talking with Debian<br />
Maintainers"..<br />
<br />
-ironic-<br />
well...  good to see that you made yourself a clean picture of both sides of this argument...<br />
-/ironic-<br />
i hope loosing the work from joerg schilling will not be too hard a blow though...<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/metalgod/2006/09/05/gentoo_is_with_cdrkit#c18155</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
