<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mart Raudsepp - Latest comments on GNOME 2.22 unmasked</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: GNOME 2.22 unmasked</title>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 08:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Xake [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c19796@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Oh, ok. I am using hardeend profile, that is why I do not see it.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, ok. I am using hardeend profile, that is why I do not see it.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2008/04/03/gnome_2_22_unmasked#c19796</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: GNOME 2.22 unmasked</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mart Raudsepp [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c19795@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>No, it's all good. As I said it's only unmasked on amd64 and x86 until the keywording list and keywording itself is done on other arches. So it's still globally masked, but unmasked in x86 and amd64 profiles, for example this can be seen here:&lt;br /&gt;
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/default-linux/x86/package.mask?rev=1.7&amp;amp;view=markup</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, it's all good. As I said it's only unmasked on amd64 and x86 until the keywording list and keywording itself is done on other arches. So it's still globally masked, but unmasked in x86 and amd64 profiles, for example this can be seen here:<br />
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/default-linux/x86/package.mask?rev=1.7&amp;view=markup]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2008/04/03/gnome_2_22_unmasked#c19795</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: GNOME 2.22 unmasked</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Xake [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c19794@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Strange. Last time I checked package.mask (http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.8472&amp;amp;view=markup) it was at the time of writing last changed 8 hours ago. But the great gnome 2.22 mask is still there... did something go wrong?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Strange. Last time I checked package.mask (http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask?rev=1.8472&amp;view=markup) it was at the time of writing last changed 8 hours ago. But the great gnome 2.22 mask is still there... did something go wrong?]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2008/04/03/gnome_2_22_unmasked#c19794</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: GNOME 2.22 unmasked</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Alex Rickabaugh [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c19787@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Upgrading now... been waiting for this since GNOME released... awesome work! Gentoo &amp;lt;3</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Upgrading now... been waiting for this since GNOME released... awesome work! Gentoo &lt;3]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2008/04/03/gnome_2_22_unmasked#c19787</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: GNOME 2.22 unmasked</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Daniel Drake [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c19786@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>thanks muchly!</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[thanks muchly!]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2008/04/03/gnome_2_22_unmasked#c19786</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: GNOME 2.22 unmasked</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Henrique Rodrigues [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c19785@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Good job. I'm still waiting for PPC, but GNOME in Gentoo has never been better.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good job. I'm still waiting for PPC, but GNOME in Gentoo has never been better.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2008/04/03/gnome_2_22_unmasked#c19785</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
