Mart Raudsepp - Latest comments on GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:24:59 +0000 dieterv [Visitor] c19251@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ I'd like http://gaphor.devjavu.com/ to be supported (even if it's only ~something in the beginning)... http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19251 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:00:00 +0000 David [Visitor] c19249@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Thanks from me as well.<br /> <br /> I know it's in bugzilla, but I'd like to see vinagre get into the stable tree. I took a stab at compiling it from source the other day, but it relies on the unstable version of GTK+, and I'm not willing to go there. (I have enough trouble trying to keep a stable system working. HA!)
I know it's in bugzilla, but I'd like to see vinagre get into the stable tree. I took a stab at compiling it from source the other day, but it relies on the unstable version of GTK+, and I'm not willing to go there. (I have enough trouble trying to keep a stable system working. HA!)]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19249 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:36:44 +0000 pacho [Visitor] c19246@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Was http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188618 fixed in gnome 2.20?<br /> <br /> Thanks :-)
Thanks :-)]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19246 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:09:44 +0000 Michael Chaffin [Visitor] c19240@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ <p>First Matt, I would like to add to the chorus and say <b>Thank you</b>. Thank you for all of your hardword on gentoo and gnome.</p><br /> <p>I recently built a new gentoo machine from the ground up and was bitten by the circular dependencies bug</p><br /> <br /> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-588590-highlight-gnome+circular+dependencies.html Circular dependecies<br /> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-571173-highlight-gnome+circular+dependencies.html<br /> Crazy circular dependencies<br /> <br /> Note, the fix to the problem is to remove the doc USE flag (-doc) from the packages <i>hal dbus</i> and <i>dbus-glib</i>.<br /> <br /> My constructive feedback, the circular dependencies mess; a 'doc' USE flag should not prevent installing gnome on a new gentoo box. First Matt, I would like to add to the chorus and say Thank you. Thank you for all of your hardword on gentoo and gnome.


I recently built a new gentoo machine from the ground up and was bitten by the circular dependencies bug



http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-588590-highlight-gnome+circular+dependencies.html Circular dependecies
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-571173-highlight-gnome+circular+dependencies.html
Crazy circular dependencies

Note, the fix to the problem is to remove the doc USE flag (-doc) from the packages hal dbus and dbus-glib.

My constructive feedback, the circular dependencies mess; a 'doc' USE flag should not prevent installing gnome on a new gentoo box.]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19240 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:25:55 +0000 Roderic [Visitor] c19239@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Hi Mart,<br /> Would it be possible for the Gnome packages to allow one to not build *all* the documentation? I'm really not concerned with the help in Chinese, or any of it at all in fact. I'd just like to be able to use the apps. I've had a lot of builds take forever or fail because of them (still haven't gotten gnome-applets to build). Other than that, Gnome seems to be perfect on Gentoo, good job. Would it be possible for the Gnome packages to allow one to not build *all* the documentation? I'm really not concerned with the help in Chinese, or any of it at all in fact. I'd just like to be able to use the apps. I've had a lot of builds take forever or fail because of them (still haven't gotten gnome-applets to build). Other than that, Gnome seems to be perfect on Gentoo, good job.]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19239 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:45:13 +0000 Hanno [Visitor] c19238@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ I'd prefer to have gnome fully build with QA-features. It especially often breaks with FEATURES="test", which stops me from using it globally on my system. http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19238 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:54:00 +0000 Jakub Klawiter [Visitor] c19237@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Hmmm domething is wrong here, I know my email address and it is not in same domain as my home page. In short words: the email verification is ... broken :)<br /> <br /> P.S. change to gmail if want to email me
P.S. change to gmail if want to email me]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19237 In response to: GNOME on Gentoo Linux feedback request Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:51:23 +0000 Jakub Klawiter [Visitor] c19236@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ First, Thank You very much for 2.20 in testing!<br /> <br /> What about:<br /> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186429<br /> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159920<br /> <br /> ?
What about:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186429
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159920

?]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio/2007/10/23/gnome_on_gentoo_linux_feedback_request#c19236