Mart Raudsepp - Latest comments on GNOME-2.16 in unstable

In response to: GNOME-2.16 in unstable

Imre [Visitor] — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:58:41 +0000

Nice :))

In response to: GNOME-2.16 in unstable

Mart Raudsepp [Member] — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:52:03 +0000

C++, mono and java bindings were not unmasked on purpose just yet. The respective herd teams for these will have to take care of this - see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132627
There are some things to sort out wrt some subprofiles having GNOME-2.16 masked due to 2.4 kernel, so they'll need to figure out which need to be masked and which not (e.g, gtk bindings should be possible to unmask, while a vte bindings that requires the newer vte can't be) in these profiles.

In response to: GNOME-2.16 in unstable

postmodern [Visitor] — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:52:21 +0000

Hopefully this will also disappear from package.mask since gnome-2.16 is on it's way to stable.

# Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org> (25 Sep 2006)
# This depends on dev-cpp/cairomm which is in the Gnome 2.16 mask, so masking
# until Gnome 2.16 is unmasked
=media-sound/bmpx-0.3*

In response to: GNOME-2.16 in unstable

Giacomo [Visitor] — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:25:14 +0000

Sorry, I meant dev-dotnet/*-sharp

In response to: GNOME-2.16 in unstable

Giacomo [Visitor] — Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:24:30 +0000

You did not unmask mono and gtkmm/glibmm. Are they supposed to be unmasked later or it was a inadvertence?