<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mike Doty - Latest comments on Part 1: tools for win32 development in linux</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/kingtaco?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Part 1: tools for win32 development in linux</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 07:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Donnie Berkholz [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c1994@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>That's a fairly broken way to do it. The standard toolchain ebuilds really just need to be fixed to handle creating a windows cross-compile toolchain.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's a fairly broken way to do it. The standard toolchain ebuilds really just need to be fixed to handle creating a windows cross-compile toolchain.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/kingtaco/2005/12/29/part_1_tools_for_win32_development_in_li#c1994</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Part 1: tools for win32 development in linux</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 05:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ian Monroe [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c1989@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>The hard part would be to setup all the libraries and such I'd guess. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like it'd be cool for when KDE 4 comes around to be able to make the Windows builds on Linux. But then you'd need to have loads of supporting libraries and such to compile something like amaroK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully I'm wrong though. :)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The hard part would be to setup all the libraries and such I'd guess. <br />
<br />
Like it'd be cool for when KDE 4 comes around to be able to make the Windows builds on Linux. But then you'd need to have loads of supporting libraries and such to compile something like amaroK.<br />
<br />
Hopefully I'm wrong though. :)]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/kingtaco/2005/12/29/part_1_tools_for_win32_development_in_li#c1989</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Part 1: tools for win32 development in linux</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Daniele Gaffuri [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c1988@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>I had to use gcc-3.4.4-r1 to compile xmingw-binutils, because 4.0.2-r2 gives an error. If someone is interested I'll retry and post the exact message.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I had to use gcc-3.4.4-r1 to compile xmingw-binutils, because 4.0.2-r2 gives an error. If someone is interested I'll retry and post the exact message.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/kingtaco/2005/12/29/part_1_tools_for_win32_development_in_li#c1988</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
