http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:21:32 +0000 Queight [Visitor] c19221@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ I agree with laen, there would be nice to see USE flags and dependencies, and it would be awesome to see revdeps.<br /> One more thing that I miss is categories list.<br /> <br /> PS Can't have email in gmail? One more thing that I miss is categories list.

PS Can't have email in gmail?]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19221 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:18:55 +0000 Nuno [Visitor] c19215@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Since the system is being re-written, I think it'd make sense if you could somehow distinguish between operating system kernels (linux, fbsd) and architectures (x86, alpha, sparc, amd64, etc...). I've always interpreted the current view more like an workaround then a definitive solution, and it would make much more sense to separate apples from oranges. http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19215 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:25:23 +0000 Horace Swaby [Visitor] c19214@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Great work -- thanks for the site.<br /> <br /> Am I correct in thinking there was a search capability on packages.gentoo.org? Would be very useful on packages.gentooext.net.<br /> <br /> Or have I missed something?
Am I correct in thinking there was a search capability on packages.gentoo.org? Would be very useful on packages.gentooext.net.

Or have I missed something?]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19214 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:39:05 +0000 laen [Visitor] c19213@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ One feature users of gentoo-portage.com are loving (and i am one of them) is the ability to see the dependencies and USE flags per release.<br /> <br /> If you could implement that, i wouldn't have to visit gentoo-portage and packages.gentoo all the time, and packages.gentoo would be so awesome :)
If you could implement that, i wouldn't have to visit gentoo-portage and packages.gentoo all the time, and packages.gentoo would be so awesome :)]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19213 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:20:48 +0000 Anonymous [Visitor] c19212@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Thank you so much! Only suggestion.. need some softer colors for the KEYWORDS status.. they are kind of harsh on the eyes currently. http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19212 Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:29:24 +0000 Markus Ullmann [Member] c19208@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ > Comment from: Michael C [Visitor]<br /> > For my own education, why did you choose 'genshi'?<br /> <br /> Well the 2 options in the end for me were cheetah and genshi. Cheetah has the advantage of pre-processing templates, rendering them as still-readable python code to save time.<br /> <br /> Downside of it, when you look at the example at [1], it's not fully xml so stuff looks cluttered when viewing it un-processed.<br /> <br /> Second thing was that due to maintaining another two websites with xml/xslt (also gentoo does this), I'm used to XPath, XInclude and whatnot and cheetah doesn't support it that easily.<br /> <br /> Uncached pageviews take slightly longer to generate with genshi than with cherrypy but cherrypy has sane caching, so I'm with it this time.<br /> <br /> [1] http://www.cheetahtemplate.org/examples.html Comment from: Michael C [Visitor]
> For my own education, why did you choose 'genshi'?

Well the 2 options in the end for me were cheetah and genshi. Cheetah has the advantage of pre-processing templates, rendering them as still-readable python code to save time.

Downside of it, when you look at the example at [1], it's not fully xml so stuff looks cluttered when viewing it un-processed.

Second thing was that due to maintaining another two websites with xml/xslt (also gentoo does this), I'm used to XPath, XInclude and whatnot and cheetah doesn't support it that easily.

Uncached pageviews take slightly longer to generate with genshi than with cherrypy but cherrypy has sane caching, so I'm with it this time.

[1] http://www.cheetahtemplate.org/examples.html]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19208 Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:01:45 +0000 hrongyorgy [Visitor] c19207@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ It seems cool. I found some screenbug if i view it from Firefox under KDE. http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19207 Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:36:21 +0000 Markus Ullmann [Member] c19206@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ >PLEASE avoid Javascript. I can browse all gentoo with Javascript<br /> >which I usually have off to protect myself, but for this I will<br /> >need it as it seems.<br /> <br /> Err no, there is no need for any javascript here. Maybe I will introduce some searchbox in ajax but that won't ever be a requirement. PLEASE avoid Javascript. I can browse all gentoo with Javascript
>which I usually have off to protect myself, but for this I will
>need it as it seems.

Err no, there is no need for any javascript here. Maybe I will introduce some searchbox in ajax but that won't ever be a requirement.]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/jokey/2007/10/02/to_view_packages_or_not_to_view_packages#c19206