<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Stefan Schweizer - Latest comments on Will the Love-Sources tradition die?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/genstef?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Will the Love-Sources tradition die?</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 13:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lovechild [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c31@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>I agree that the unsupported software forum is a good idea, and believe it or not, I dislike the Reiser4 patch nearly as much as Ciaran does - just ask in the #love-sources channel, but I can't get it removed since it's not my decision alone. We have a staff board that votes on these things, and currently people who don't have to actively maintain that patch are voting for it to stay - despite several tests exposing serious interactivity problems, and it generally being a pain in the ass feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't personally promote the patch, again ask the channel for verification, and it made me very unpopular with the long time users - I don't however disagree with peoples right to test such features - I just won't have anything to do with it at all supportwise, and I don't think it's fair to expect me, or the Gentoo developers to provide support for this feature (note ever since the love-sources team was asked to include a disclaimer, we have - we don't intend to burden the Gentoo team in anyway - but we can't account for people's stupidity and idiotic behavior).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Lovechild</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree that the unsupported software forum is a good idea, and believe it or not, I dislike the Reiser4 patch nearly as much as Ciaran does - just ask in the #love-sources channel, but I can't get it removed since it's not my decision alone. We have a staff board that votes on these things, and currently people who don't have to actively maintain that patch are voting for it to stay - despite several tests exposing serious interactivity problems, and it generally being a pain in the ass feature.<br />
<br />
I don't personally promote the patch, again ask the channel for verification, and it made me very unpopular with the long time users - I don't however disagree with peoples right to test such features - I just won't have anything to do with it at all supportwise, and I don't think it's fair to expect me, or the Gentoo developers to provide support for this feature (note ever since the love-sources team was asked to include a disclaimer, we have - we don't intend to burden the Gentoo team in anyway - but we can't account for people's stupidity and idiotic behavior).<br />
<br />
-Lovechild]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/genstef/2005/03/17/will_the_love_sources_tradition_die#c31</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
