<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Stefan Schweizer - Latest comments on Experimental drivers on the livecd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/genstef?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Experimental drivers on the livecd</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>blubb [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c397@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>i think it is importent that we know our livecds are working the way they're expected to. Putting drivers onto a livecd without testing them seriously is even worse than a livecd missing a certain module. These livecds will stay as they are for about 6 months, and if they're broken, they will stay broken. As you stated, there are alternatives: I'd just use another livecd if I really can't install Gentoo without said driver.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[i think it is importent that we know our livecds are working the way they're expected to. Putting drivers onto a livecd without testing them seriously is even worse than a livecd missing a certain module. These livecds will stay as they are for about 6 months, and if they're broken, they will stay broken. As you stated, there are alternatives: I'd just use another livecd if I really can't install Gentoo without said driver.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/genstef/2005/06/21/experimental_drivers_on_the_livecd#c397</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
