http://blogs.gentoo.org/flameeyes?disp=comments en-US http://backend.userland.com/rss 60 Fri, 04 Aug 2006 08:23:14 +0000 Tracy [Visitor] c17041@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Well done!<br /> http://esgbqpkq.com/ebwu/soaq.html | http://rkdnxyae.com/nhvq/ruyq.html http://esgbqpkq.com/ebwu/soaq.html | http://rkdnxyae.com/nhvq/ruyq.html]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/flameeyes/2006/03/05/a_few_news_to_kde_users#c17041 Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:00:28 +0000 nhey vanoy [Visitor] c16934@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ jikw ajmdcp xdofagwc lsibr svito ohqidjb gsbiu http://blogs.gentoo.org/flameeyes/2006/03/05/a_few_news_to_kde_users#c16934 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:21:59 +0000 M.Pomme [Visitor] c3955@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ Hello,<br /> I'm not too sure if I'm allowed to report bugs against net-im/kopete, so I'm just posting a shy comment here because something is very strange with this ebuild. It records itself in the database (and in the world file) as kde-base/kdenetwork, and not as net-im/kopete! Is it intented .. ?! I'm using kdenetwork-meta, so there was no name conflict. I'm not too sure if I'm allowed to report bugs against net-im/kopete, so I'm just posting a shy comment here because something is very strange with this ebuild. It records itself in the database (and in the world file) as kde-base/kdenetwork, and not as net-im/kopete! Is it intented .. ?! I'm using kdenetwork-meta, so there was no name conflict.]]> http://blogs.gentoo.org/flameeyes/2006/03/05/a_few_news_to_kde_users#c3955 Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:26:57 +0000 Simon Farnsworth [Visitor] c3745@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ So, how many "version bump" bug reports were filed for amaroK 1.4_beta2 (apart from the obvious "too many")? http://blogs.gentoo.org/flameeyes/2006/03/05/a_few_news_to_kde_users#c3745 Mon, 06 Mar 2006 01:15:26 +0000 Infirit [Visitor] c3744@http://blogs.gentoo.org/ LOL Not too long ago people where asking for the amd64 keyword to be added! Will amd64 rules the world? ;-) http://blogs.gentoo.org/flameeyes/2006/03/05/a_few_news_to_kde_users#c3744