<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Petteri R&#228;ty - Latest comments on OpenJDK ebuild</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.5"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: OpenJDK ebuild</title>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>S&#246;nke M&#252;ller-Lund [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c20065@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>The ebuild-link does not work. :(&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The ebuild-link does not work. :(<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2007/05/08/openjdk_ebuild#c20065</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: OpenJDK ebuild</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>betelgeuse [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18916@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Well it's not as simple as cross compiling I guess. Preferable the VM would work too. That means having a JIT in Hotspot for Sparc but there should be an interpreter too that the RedHat people at least are looking into.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well it's not as simple as cross compiling I guess. Preferable the VM would work too. That means having a JIT in Hotspot for Sparc but there should be an interpreter too that the RedHat people at least are looking into.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2007/05/08/openjdk_ebuild#c18916</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: OpenJDK ebuild</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jeff [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18915@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Has anyone succeeded in cross-compiling it for sparc? Sparc (Linux) has not had a version of Java since 1.3 or 1.4 I believe. I was getting ready to try cross compiling.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Has anyone succeeded in cross-compiling it for sparc? Sparc (Linux) has not had a version of Java since 1.3 or 1.4 I believe. I was getting ready to try cross compiling.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2007/05/08/openjdk_ebuild#c18915</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: OpenJDK ebuild</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Insanity5902 (Ryan) [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18887@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>I found a few problems, one was the arc var wasn't being set right, which now seems to be fixed, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
another problem was libjli.so doesn't have the right permissions set on it, only root can read it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been half-ass documenting my stuff at the thread listed as my URL.  Check it out.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW , my T7600 cpu was able to compile it in under 30 minutes :)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I found a few problems, one was the arc var wasn't being set right, which now seems to be fixed, <br />
<br />
another problem was libjli.so doesn't have the right permissions set on it, only root can read it.<br />
<br />
I have been half-ass documenting my stuff at the thread listed as my URL.  Check it out.  <br />
<br />
BTW , my T7600 cpu was able to compile it in under 30 minutes :)]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2007/05/08/openjdk_ebuild#c18887</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: OpenJDK ebuild</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 19:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bo [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18885@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Thanks, works good up to now.&lt;br /&gt;
Compiling takes a lot longer on my old box :-)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks, works good up to now.<br />
Compiling takes a lot longer on my old box :-)]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2007/05/08/openjdk_ebuild#c18885</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: OpenJDK ebuild</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>betelgeuse [Member]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18884@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Yeah another user stumbled onto this problem too. It's because amd64 has one more character than i486 so it just goes over the top. The solution is to make PORTAGE_TMPDIR shorter than the default /var/tmp/portage.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah another user stumbled onto this problem too. It's because amd64 has one more character than i486 so it just goes over the top. The solution is to make PORTAGE_TMPDIR shorter than the default /var/tmp/portage.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2007/05/08/openjdk_ebuild#c18884</link>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: OpenJDK ebuild</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bo [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c18883@http://blogs.gentoo.org/</guid>
			<description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hope your exam went good.&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to use the ebuild (out of curiosity), but it failed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has a few times&lt;br /&gt;
&gt; [exec] /bin/sh: /bin/ls: Argument list too long&lt;br /&gt;
and a&lt;br /&gt;
&gt; [exec] javac: no source files&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where could I report this bug with the whole output? Bugzilla?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
hope your exam went good.<br />
I tried to use the ebuild (out of curiosity), but it failed.<br />
<br />
It has a few times<br />
> [exec] /bin/sh: /bin/ls: Argument list too long<br />
and a<br />
> [exec] javac: no source files<br />
<br />
Where could I report this bug with the whole output? Bugzilla?]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2007/05/08/openjdk_ebuild#c18883</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
