<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Petteri Räty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse</link>
	<description>Just another Gentoo Blogs site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:13:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux 3.2 and Logitech Unifying Receiver by Andrea</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2012/03/10/linux-3-2-and-logitech-unifying-receiver/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/?p=51#comment-501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strange is that I have the Unifying Receiver working for my keyboard and M180 mouse without any problem, but I&#039;ve also bought a Performance MX mouse and I have to pull out and then in the usb connector to activate it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange is that I have the Unifying Receiver working for my keyboard and M180 mouse without any problem, but I&#8217;ve also bought a Performance MX mouse and I have to pull out and then in the usb connector to activate it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux 3.2 and Logitech Unifying Receiver by chithanh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2012/03/10/linux-3-2-and-logitech-unifying-receiver/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>chithanh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/?p=51#comment-485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is because you have CONFIG_EXPERT (aka. CONFIG_SHOOT_SELF_IN_FOOT) enabled. There you need to be extra careful on kernel upgrades.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is because you have CONFIG_EXPERT (aka. CONFIG_SHOOT_SELF_IN_FOOT) enabled. There you need to be extra careful on kernel upgrades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux 3.2 and Logitech Unifying Receiver by Mike Lothian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2012/03/10/linux-3-2-and-logitech-unifying-receiver/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lothian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/?p=51#comment-484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might want to all make sure people know they&#039;ll need to add HID Raw too 

I fell fowl of that too]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to all make sure people know they&#8217;ll need to add HID Raw too </p>
<p>I fell fowl of that too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux 3.2 and Logitech Unifying Receiver by kollin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2012/03/10/linux-3-2-and-logitech-unifying-receiver/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>kollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/?p=51#comment-483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metadata Cache Backend Based on Extended Attributes by betelgeuse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2009/10/24/extended-attributes-based-metadata-cache/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>betelgeuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was interesting to test and implement in order to find out how extended attributes work. Not everything implemented has to be something that would actually become something users would use or even usable in the general sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was interesting to test and implement in order to find out how extended attributes work. Not everything implemented has to be something that would actually become something users would use or even usable in the general sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metadata Cache Backend Based on Extended Attributes by Ciaran McCreesh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2009/10/24/extended-attributes-based-metadata-cache/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciaran McCreesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please tell me this is an elaborate hoax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me this is an elaborate hoax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metadata Cache Backend Based on Extended Attributes by Donnie Berkholz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2009/10/24/extended-attributes-based-metadata-cache/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Berkholz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome! I&#039;m so glad that you implemented and tested this, since it&#039;s the same as an idea I had a while back.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Profiling sounds like a great idea. Might be that the performance would out-do current if a bug or few get fixed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How&#039;s the cold-cache comparison? I&#039;d expect that accessing half the number of files (ebuild only instead of cache+ebuild) doesn&#039;t improve performance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! I&#8217;m so glad that you implemented and tested this, since it&#8217;s the same as an idea I had a while back.</p>
<p>Profiling sounds like a great idea. Might be that the performance would out-do current if a bug or few get fixed.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s the cold-cache comparison? I&#8217;d expect that accessing half the number of files (ebuild only instead of cache+ebuild) doesn&#8217;t improve performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Binary package for icedtea6 by Andrew John Hughes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2008/12/18/binary_packages_for_icedtea6/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew John Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1*10^6 :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1*10^6 <img src='http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Binary package for icedtea6 by Pacho Ramos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2008/12/18/binary_packages_for_icedtea6/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacho Ramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems that proper command is:&lt;br /&gt;
layman -a java-overlay&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
instead of simply &quot;java&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that proper command is:<br />
layman -a java-overlay</p>
<p>instead of simply &#8220;java&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks <img src='http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting MX Revolution setup in Gentoo by Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gentoo.org/betelgeuse/2006/11/26/getting_mx_revolution_setup_in_gentoo/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems there&#039;s a new version of the MX-5500 mouse with the same vendor and product ID, but that communicates differently, and revoco hasn&#039;t been updated to work with it.  It detects the MX-5500 and prints the warning about it being experimental, but ultimately doesn&#039;t work&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At work, I have the previous version and it works great to change mode.  But at home, I have the newer one, and it doesn&#039;t work.  Unfortunately I&#039;m not familiar enough with libusb to see immediately why it&#039;s failing.  I do have several notes from a usbmon dump while using VirtualBox/XP to control the mouse, and have identified several features of both the keyboard and the mouse, in case anyone would like to take a stab at fixing revoco&#039;s support or writing an additional application for working with the keyboard.  Feel free to contact me for the usbmon dump and notes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems there&#8217;s a new version of the MX-5500 mouse with the same vendor and product ID, but that communicates differently, and revoco hasn&#8217;t been updated to work with it.  It detects the MX-5500 and prints the warning about it being experimental, but ultimately doesn&#8217;t work</p>
<p>At work, I have the previous version and it works great to change mode.  But at home, I have the newer one, and it doesn&#8217;t work.  Unfortunately I&#8217;m not familiar enough with libusb to see immediately why it&#8217;s failing.  I do have several notes from a usbmon dump while using VirtualBox/XP to control the mouse, and have identified several features of both the keyboard and the mouse, in case anyone would like to take a stab at fixing revoco&#8217;s support or writing an additional application for working with the keyboard.  Feel free to contact me for the usbmon dump and notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
